OpTic Gaming CEO Hector “HECZ” Rodriguez has claimed that the Call of Duty League blocked a sponsorship deal worth close to $1 million that would have placed a brand logo directly on the team’s skin in-game.

Speaking in an interview with The Flank’s Ben Nissim, Hecz revealed that financial services company USAA had approached OpTic with what he described as a “close to a million-dollar” sponsorship proposal.

According to Rodriguez, the deal would have seen USAA’s logo appear on OpTic’s player models in-game — a rare form of sponsorship integration in the Call of Duty ecosystem.

CDL Denies Team Sponsorship Opportunity

“I got approached by USAA with a substantial – and I mean substantial, close to an M – sponsorship opportunity” Hecz said. “They wanted the real estate on the back of our jersey in-game. The answer was ‘No.’ Because military, and other stuff.

“Why wouldn’t the Huntsmen be approved? Because the money was going directly to the team.”

According to Rodriguez, the issue was not the sponsor itself, which went on to become a sponsor of the League and certain teams, but rather the financial structure of the agreement.

He suggested the Call of Duty League was unwilling to approve a deal in which OpTic retained the commercial upside, rather than sharing revenue with the League itself.

The Call of Duty League has historically maintained strict controls over sponsorship categories, team branding, and in-game integrations, particularly when they fall outside of league-wide partnerships.

In-Game Branding Remains Rare in COD

In-game sponsorship placements remain uncommon across the Call of Duty League, with most team branding limited to real-world jerseys, broadcast overlays, and social content. Player character models, in particular, have largely remained free of team-specific sponsor logos.

This segment came from a near-5-hour interview with Nissim and Rodriguez, in which they discussed just about every facet of the League and the esport itself.

As of the time of writing, neither the Call of Duty League nor USAA has publicly commented on the claim.